Talk:Lok Sabha

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Restrictions placed: 8 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lok Sabha article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Politics Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.
	This article was a past Indian Collaboration of the Month.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 2 to 8, 2024

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Congress party (INC) have 99 members only not 101. It is a mistake in wikipedia for Loksabha page. And BJP have 241 members. AndTMC have 29 members. Sourav110899 (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rainsage (talk) 02:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024 (3)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change "Francis George" to "K. Francis George." Currently, the link leads to an American archbishop, not the Indian politician. Xshayarsha42 (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rainsage (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"non-voting members"??

Discussion moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics#Template:Infobox Indian constituency. Please continue there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 February 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the right summary chart table, remove wherever "non-voting" is written in the bracket to the total seats of each party which is referenced by footnotes (1). Article 88 is irrelevant here. There is no provision for non-voting MPs. 49.43.41.96 (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nitesh TALK 21:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 April 2025

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Lok Sabha. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

It should be referred to as "INDI Alliance" or "I.N.D.I.A." rather than simply "INDIA" The editor should consider the perspective of an international audience when reviewing the text. 115.98.33.209 (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]