Jump to content

Talk:San people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSan people was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Monogamy

[edit]

User:Greenman please explain why you prefer a random and inaccessible website to an Oxford University Press book. Will you revert me also if I add Human Relations Area Files as a source, which I intended to do? Doug Weller talk 10:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not notice it is a travel site selling tours?[1]. Doug Weller talk 11:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Doug Weller: Apologies, I seem to have got things mixed up, perhaps because your edit was made at the same time as mine. I've restored your source, but the text appeared incomplete. If your edit intended to say that "95% of San are monogamous", it should be clear the date that this refers to, so for now I've left it as 'most'. Greenman (talk) 13:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Greenman No problem now. I'll look at it tomorrow, too busy today. Doug Weller talk 14:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]